CO129-191 - Public Offices & Others - 1880 — Page 170

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Thief Justice said that the Messageries Maritimes do not carry mails, or things subsidised within the meaning of the postal convention

Nr 22/3

14

opinion upon the

Cavender

between

Seest Pris & Frame

The F. O. express.

mopriety of the Governor's action but pa

Fanling

out that the bend of the Admiralty Division of the High Court in this case

Court in the case of the Parlement Belge" (which

in this point was not heard by this Court of Appeal) has superseded the instructions,

made on opinions of the Law Officers, which have from time to time been pointed out from Story Kany to treat the ships of the Messageries Maritimes as entitled to the privileges of ships of war in this port under the Postal Convention. but I think the Governor acted judiciously in the difficult circumstances

in which he was placed

Perhaps it would be but fair to go further than saying

pections the three state eus

having you the

winstructions.

no reason to disapprove

of

his action in not altering

the ship detained but that there instructions must

now be considered

as superseded by the recent decisions

of the Court, and

in the present case

approved by the Law Officers Colonial Act

And that we are considering

any

this part of legislation on the subject and

Art

The whole

about to present again urge upon the French great Britain

a

preparation made in 1896 for

frem

AL

arrangement

whereby justifying the word out if y Sis & Hertslet's

Memorandum]

minkant of open Salon with the whole Colony, to open this put sun?

Kreefiority

in the Oper

Recommend the amendment of the Opium Ordinance mintage,

by

ko has the "

2423 Ariary

*

o

Dr

holl buff

Calory S

in the sense indicated in minute on

Luz that in this amendment care must be taken

to the Opium Trader full protection

7

any

to secure

rights under his contract.

As the F.O. do not notice the decision

167

the J

Supreme Court after saying that the ships of the Messageries Maritimes are not within the words of the Convention it may be well to suggest to them that steps should be taken in concert with the French Government for defining more clearly by a supplemental Convention the rules which are intended to have the benefit of the privileges conferred by the 5th clause

of the

The existing Convention

EN

2.4

Revoll Apr

Witts

Caprit 3

Edit History

2026-05-22 03:38:35 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Thief Justice said that the Messageries Maritimes do not carry mails, or things subsidised within the meaning of the postal convention Nr 22/3 14 opinion upon the Cavender between Seest Pris & Frame The F. O. express. mopriety of the Governor's action but pa Fanling out that the bend of the Admiralty Division of the High Court in this case Court in the case of the Parlement Belge" (which in this point was not heard by this Court of Appeal) has superseded the instructions, made on opinions of the Law Officers, which have from time to time been pointed out from Story Kany to treat the ships of the Messageries Maritimes as entitled to the privileges of ships of war in this port under the Postal Convention. but I think the Governor acted judiciously in the difficult circumstances in which he was placed Perhaps it would be but fair to go further than saying pections the three state eus having you the winstructions. no reason to disapprove of his action in not altering the ship detained but that there instructions must now be considered as superseded by the recent decisions of the Court, and in the present case approved by the Law Officers Colonial Act And that we are considering any this part of legislation on the subject and Art The whole about to present again urge upon the French great Britain a preparation made in 1896 for frem AL arrangement whereby justifying the word out if y Sis & Hertslet's Memorandum] minkant of open Salon with the whole Colony, to open this put sun? Kreefiority in the Oper Recommend the amendment of the Opium Ordinance mintage, by ko has the " 2423 Ariary * o Dr holl buff Calory S in the sense indicated in minute on Luz that in this amendment care must be taken to the Opium Trader full protection 7 any to secure rights under his contract. As the F.O. do not notice the decision 167 the J Supreme Court after saying that the ships of the Messageries Maritimes are not within the words of the Convention it may be well to suggest to them that steps should be taken in concert with the French Government for defining more clearly by a supplemental Convention the rules which are intended to have the benefit of the privileges conferred by the 5th clause of the The existing Convention EN 2.4 Revoll Apr Witts Caprit 3
Baseline (Original)
Thief Justice that the Mepaperies Maritimes do not carry minies, or that thing not subsidised within the meaning of the postal convention Nr 22/3 14 opinion upon the Cavender between Seest Pris & Frame The F. O. express. mopriety of the Governor's action but pa Fanling out that the bend of the Admiralty Division othe High Court in this case Court in the case of the Parlement Belye" (which in this point was net reared o this Court of Appeal) has superseded the instructions, maid on opinions ofthe Law oppiens, wheel have hem time to time ben poin to fromiony Stony Kany to treat the ships of the Messageries Maritimes as entitled to the privileges of shapes of war in this patos Masking & vitive of the Portal Convention. but I think bottennissy on No death this is to the whole acted judiciously in the difficult circumstances this which he was placed Perhaps th it would be but hef topo further than saying pections the three state eus having you the winstructions. no reason to disappen. f of his action in it not altering the shif the detained but that there instruction's mast now be considered as supe in the case K of the sorgit Court, an in the present case ruded by the recent decisions and Auchen by the Lapons Calenial Auct And that 1. to fit are considering amy this partein of legislation on the subist and Art The wh about to prefenther again urge upon the heuch great buchitition f a preperat made in 1896 for fremm AL anangement whereby gusting the word out if y Sis & Hertsleti Memerendum ] minkant of open Sadon with the w the Colony, to open dris put sun? Kreefiority in the Oper Recommend the amendment of the Opinne Odinence mintage, by kit fo kohas the " 2423 Ariary * o Dr holl buff Calory S in the sexce indicated in minute on Luz that in mit amendment are must be taken to the Opium Trimer pull protection 7 any to secur rights under his contract. As the F.0. do rut notices the decision 167 the J Supreme Court afttrykeny that the ships of the Messageries Maritimes are ret within the wouds of the Convention it may be will to support to them that steps should I lähen in Cravest with the hench Gwemment for désining more clearly by a supplemental Convention the repels util are intended to have the best of the privileges Amporad 5 the 5th clause of the The existing Convention EN 2.4 Revoll Apr Witts Caprit 3
2026-05-22 03:38:35 · Baseline
View content

Thief Justice that the Mepaperies Maritimes do not carry minies, or that thing

not subsidised within the meaning of the postal convention

Nr 22/3

14

opinion upon the

Cavender

between

Seest Pris & Frame

The F. O. express.

mopriety of the Governor's action but pa

Fanling

out that the bend of the Admiralty Division othe High Court in this case

Court in the case of the Parlement

Belye" (which

in this point was net reared o this Court of Appeal) has superseded the instructions,

maid on opinions ofthe Law oppiens, wheel have hem time to time ben poin to fromiony Stony Kany to treat the ships of the Messageries Maritimes as entitled to the privileges of shapes of war in this patos Masking & vitive

of the Portal Convention. but I think bottennissy on

No death this is to

the whole acted judiciously in the difficult circumstances

this which he was placed

Perhaps th

it would be but hef topo further than saying

pections the three state eus

having you the

winstructions.

no reason to disappen.

f

of

his action in it not altering

the shif the detained but that there instruction's mast

now be considered

as supe in the case K

of the sorgit Court, an

in the present case

ruded by the recent decisions

and Auchen by the Lapons Calenial Auct

And that 1. to fit are considering

amy

this partein of legislation on the subist and

Art

The wh

about to prefenther again urge upon the heuch great buchitition f

a

preperat made in 1896 for

fremm

AL

anangement

whereby gusting the word out if y Sis & Hertsleti

Memerendum ]

minkant of open Sadon with the w the Colony, to open dris put sun?

Kreefiority

in the Oper

Recommend the amendment of the Opinne Odinence mintage,

by kit

fo kohas the "

2423 Ariary

*

o

Dr

holl buff

Calory S

in the sexce indicated in minute on

Luz that in mit amendment are must be taken

to the Opium Trimer pull protection

7

any

to secur

rights under his contract.

As the F.0. do rut notices the decision

167

the J

Supreme Court afttrykeny that the ships of the Messageries Maritimes are ret within the wouds of the Convention it may be will to support to them that steps should I lähen in Cravest with the hench Gwemment for désining more clearly by a supplemental Convention the repels util are intended to have the best of the privileges Amporad 5 the 5th clause

of the

The existing Convention

EN

2.4

Revoll Apr

Witts

Caprit 3

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.